From: Victor Cappuccio (cvictor@protokolgroup.com)
Date: Sat May 13 2006 - 18:56:44 ART
Hi all,
In which version, do they realize that the synchronization was not
necessary?
Why in early versions synchronization was on?
Is the idea of this to have it enables or disabled comes from EGP?
Why EGP is not also used in these days (from popularity like BGP)??
Can I run EGP in a Cisco Router?
Thanks
Victor.
-----Mensaje original-----
De: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] En nombre de Chris
Lewis
Enviado el: Sabado, 13 de Mayo de 2006 05:12 p.m.
Para: CCIEin2006
CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Asunto: Re: BGP Synchronization - When do OSPF and BGP router ID need to
match?
With synchronization enabled, The router needs to learn of a route via an
IGP as well as BGP.
In addition, with OSPF only the ID of the router originating the route in to
OSPF and the ID of the router originating the route in to BGP must also
match.
Chris
On 5/13/06, CCIEin2006 <ciscocciein2006@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello group,
>
> Please examine the following setup:
>
> 10.1.1.0
> |
> (R2)
> |
> BGP
> |
> (R1)---BGP---(R3)
>
> All three routers are running ospf and iBGP with Synchronization enabled.
> R1 is acting as route reflector for R2 and R3.
>
> Will the 10.1.1.0 network advertised by R2 appear in the BGP table of R3?
> If not please explain why.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:21 ART