From: ZeroFlash (Fire_Ice@verizon.net)
Date: Wed May 10 2006 - 10:45:14 ART
The answer should be the neighbor command because otherwise even with
authentication EIGRP will still multicast routing updates to all routers on
that VLAN. Using the Neighbor command with ensure that only that host
receives the updates. If you want you can still use authentication (doesn't
answer the question) but the answer is the neighbor command.
Or if you want to get fancy you can NAT the multicast to a Unicast address.
Thanks
ZeroFlash
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
rocco ******
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 6:44 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: EIGRP Neighbor command vs Authentication
What is more appropriate? ......I don't want eigrp hosts running on the
same VLAN to intercept EIGRP communications? I'm doing IEWB 4.5 and
answered it using MD5 auth but the answer key says to use the neighbor
command? Am I wrong?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:21 ART