From: Radioactive Frog (pbhatkoti@gmail.com)
Date: Fri May 12 2006 - 09:55:35 ART
Hi ZeroFlash,
Never heard about nating multicast to a unicast address. But do u see an
example of this sort of thing in real-world ?
Best use ?
Regards,
Frog
On 5/10/06, ZeroFlash <Fire_Ice@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> The answer should be the neighbor command because otherwise even with
> authentication EIGRP will still multicast routing updates to all routers
> on
> that VLAN. Using the Neighbor command with ensure that only that host
> receives the updates. If you want you can still use authentication
> (doesn't
> answer the question) but the answer is the neighbor command.
>
> Or if you want to get fancy you can NAT the multicast to a Unicast
> address.
>
> Thanks
>
> ZeroFlash
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> rocco ******
> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 6:44 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: EIGRP Neighbor command vs Authentication
>
> What is more appropriate? ......I don't want eigrp hosts running on the
> same VLAN to intercept EIGRP communications? I'm doing IEWB 4.5 and
> answered it using MD5 auth but the answer key says to use the neighbor
> command? Am I wrong?
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:21 ART