From: Magmax (magmax@bigpond.net.au)
Date: Mon May 01 2006 - 22:39:04 ART
In the lab diagram R2, R6, BB1, BB3 are running RIP v2 and there is OSPF
area 2 between R1 and R2
I believe in IGP section we are doing mutual redistribution between RIP and
OSPF on R2 which should make 204.12.1.0/24 subnet reachable from others
routers
Ubaid
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Anderson Mota Alves
Sent: Tuesday, 2 May 2006 11:18 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Lab 7 - IEWB (Redistribution) task 4.8 and 4.9
Hi Brians, I don't know if I'm wrong on this but I was having problems in
BGP in this lab because R1 was not seeing the bgp routes as best from R2
when I was issuing "show ip bgp" after some time I was able to figure it
out that the R2 was sending the bgp routes to R1 (iBGP) with a next-hop
of R6 (204.12.1.6) and then I realized that R1 didn't have the route of
204.12.1.0/24 installed on his route table so I had to go to R2 and
change one requirement from 4.8 (change the route-map CONNECTED_TO_OSPF
permit 10 matching not only the loopback but also the interface fa0/0 of
R2 (which is 204.12.1.2) only after this R1 start receiving the
204.12.1.0 routes from R2 and the BGP worked just fine. Please let me
know if I'm right or if I may be missing something here. Thanks,Andy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:20 ART