RE: Frame relay order of operation

From: Curt Girardin (curt.girardin@chicos.com)
Date: Tue Apr 25 2006 - 15:06:52 GMT-3


In my experience, once you get those pesky dynamic maps, they don't go
away until you reboot. I have the best luck by shuting down the serial
interfaces BEFORE setting up frame-relay encapsulation.

HTH,

Curt Girardin, CCIE #15972

 

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
allboutcisco
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 12:40 PM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: Frame relay order of operation

Hi group,

I believe if the proper order of configuration is carried out for frame
relay, there won't be mappings to 0.0.0.0. The following is what i did
but am still getting the 0.0.0.0 maps.

Rack1R6#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
Rack1R6(config)#int s0/0
Rack1R6(config-if)#do sh run int s0/0
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 93 bytes
!
interface Serial0/0
 ip address 54.1.1.6 255.255.255.0
 no dce-terminal-timing-enable
end

Rack1R6(config-if)#sh
*Mar 1 04:36:28.317: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Serial0/0, changed
state to administratively down Rack1R6(config-if)#enc fram
Rack1R6(config-if)#no fram inv Rack1R6(config-if)#fram map ip 54.1.1.254
101 br Rack1R6(config-if)#no sh Rack1R6(config-if)#^Z *Mar 1
04:37:16.372: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console
Rack1R6#sh fram map Serial0/0 (up): ip 0.0.0.0 dlci 401(0x191,0x6410)
              broadcast,
              CISCO, status defined, inactive Serial0/0 (up): ip 0.0.0.0
dlci 301(0x12D,0x48D0)
              broadcast,
              CISCO, status defined, inactive Serial0/0 (up): ip
54.1.1.254 dlci 101(0x65,0x1850), static,
              broadcast,
              CISCO, status defined, inactive Rack1R6# *Mar 1
04:37:18.295: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Serial0/0, changed state to up

I found a thread on this posted some time back and he tried to do the
static mappings after doing a "no shut". I've tried that as well, but
these darn zeroes are still showing up...

Thanks in advance.

-K



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:59 GMT-3