From: Victor Cappuccio (cvictor@protokolgroup.com)
Date: Wed Apr 19 2006 - 08:06:37 GMT-3
Hello All,
As far as I know, first Shapper then Queuing, so the 75% belongs to the
Configured Queue.
Please see this link
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ito_doc/qos.htm#1020856
Victor.
Mohammed Shameen Abdul Jabbar escribis:
So you mean , if the question does not refer to WFQ, 75% bandwidth does not
come into picture at all?
On 4/19/06, victor.oporto@empresas.telefonica.es < victor.oporto@empresas.telefonica.es > wrote:
Hi, I think that the 75% is the default reserveable bw for WFQ not
for the traffic shaping.
Regards
*"Mohammed Shameen Abdul Jabbar" <ccie.xpert@gmail.com> *
Enviado por: nobody@groupstudy.com
19/04/2006 11:30
Por favor, responda a "Mohammed Shameen Abdul Jabbar"
Para: "Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com> cc:
Asunto: Frame relay Traffic shapping
Hi,
I have a question on the frame-relay traffic shapping.
If in the question, it is mentioned that the port speed of s0/0 is 512K &
DLCI 204 uses 128k, The remaining two DLCI's 201 and 203 share the "
remaining-bandwidth".
I am confused on the term "remaining-bandwidth" . I have read that , only
75% of the port banwidth is used for normal traffic.
So the remaining bandwith should be calculated as :
512 x 75/100 =
384kbps
DLCI 204 =
128kbps
DLCI 201 = DLCI 203 =
(384 - 128)/2 = 256/2 = 128kbps
OR is it calculated as
DLCI 204 = 128Kbps
DLCI 201 = DLCI 203
=
(512 - 128)/2 = 192Kbps
Can anyone tell me which one is the correct method.
Regards
shamin
_______________________________________________________________________
Subscription information may be found at: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
_____________________________________________________________________
Mensaje analizado y protegido, tecnologia antivirus www.trendmicro.es
_______________________________________________________________________
Subscription information may be found at: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:58 GMT-3