From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Mon Apr 17 2006 - 13:03:42 GMT-3
Try clearing the EIGRP adjacencies on R6, otherwise your configuration
looks good.
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mohammed Shameen Abdul Jabbar [mailto:ccie.xpert@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 11:01 PM
> To: Brian McGahan
> Subject: Re: IEWB VER3.0 LAB-2 TASK-4.6
>
> Thanks Brian for your answer
>
> I had not advertised the particular route. Maybe thats the reason. I
> hav disabled auto-summary already. I will try and advertise the route
> into eigrp under the eigrp process 10 on BB1.
>
> It worked !! Thanks.
>
> Brian, can you please advise more on the particular question.
>
> As per the requirement in the question to be met, what is the prefix
> that i should advertise and from which router. I tested this by
> advertising ..
>
> 200.1.0.1
> 200.1.1.1
> 200.1.2.1
> 200.1.3.1
>
> from BB1 to R6 and R6 summarizes it to the rest of the eigrp network.
> It worked but right now I get a summary route as well as all the
> individual routes along. Any mistakes I might be doin.
>
> I am posting my config , If you can please advise.
>
> Rack1R6#
>
> !
> !
> !
> interface Loopback0
> ip address 150.1.6.6 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Ethernet0/0
> no ip address
> half-duplex
> !
> interface Ethernet0/0.6
> encapsulation dot1Q 6 native
> ip address 132.1.6.6 255.255.255.0
> no snmp trap link-status
> !
> interface Ethernet0/0.26
> encapsulation dot1Q 26
> ip address 132.1.26.6 255.255.255.0
> ip summary-address eigrp 10 200.0.0.0 255.255.252.0 5
> no snmp trap link-status
> !
> interface Serial0/0
> ip address 54.1.2.6 255.255.255.0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> no dce-terminal-timing-enable
> no fair-queue
> !
> interface TokenRing0/0
> no ip address
> shutdown
> ring-speed 16
> !
> interface Ethernet1/0
> no ip address
> shutdown
> half-duplex
> !
> router eigrp 10
> network 54.1.2.6 0.0.0.0
> network 132.1.26.6 0.0.0.0
> network 150.1.6.6 0.0.0.0
> no auto-summary
> eigrp router-id 150.1.6.6
> neighbor 132.1.26.2 Ethernet0/0.26
> !
> ip http server
> !
> !
> !
> !
> !
>
>
>
***************************X************************X*******************
**
> ***
> My BB1 configuration is :
>
> BB1#
> !
> !
> interface Loopback0
> ip address 200.1.0.1 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Loopback1
> ip address 200.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Loopback2
> ip address 200.1.2.1 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Loopback3
> ip address 200.1.3.1 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Loopback11
> ip address 150.1.11.11 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Ethernet0
> no ip address
> shutdown
> !
> interface Serial0
> ip address 54.1.2.254 255.255.255.0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> !
> interface Serial1
> no ip address
> shutdown
> !
> router eigrp 10
> network 54.1.2.254 0.0.0.0
> network 150.1.11.11 0.0.0.0
> network 200.1.0.1 0.0.0.0
> network 200.1.1.1 0.0.0.0
> network 200.1.2.1 0.0.0.0
> network 200.1.3.1 0.0.0.0
> no auto-summary
> eigrp router-id 150.1.11.11
> no eigrp log-neighbor-changes
> !
> ip classless
> ip http server
> !
>
> *************X*****************X*****************
>
> The partial routing table of R2 is as below:
>
> R2#
>
> Gateway of last resort is not set
>
> D 200.1.0.0/24 [90/2323456] via 132.1.26.6, 00:07:27, Ethernet0/0
> 54.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> D 54.1.2.0 [90/2195456] via 132.1.26.6, 01:02:53, Ethernet0/0
> D 200.1.1.0/24 [90/2323456] via 132.1.26.6, 00:07:27, Ethernet0/0
> D 200.1.2.0/24 [90/2323456] via 132.1.26.6, 00:07:27, Ethernet0/0
> D 200.1.3.0/24 [90/2323456] via 132.1.26.6, 00:07:27, Ethernet0/0
> 132.1.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 12 subnets, 2 masks
> O 132.1.0.4/32 [110/64] via 132.1.0.4, 01:02:04, Serial0/0
> O 132.1.0.1/32 [110/64] via 132.1.0.1, 01:02:05, Serial0/0
> C 132.1.0.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0/0
> O IA 132.1.3.0/24 [110/74] via 132.1.0.3, 01:02:05, Serial0/0
> O 132.1.0.3/32 [110/64] via 132.1.0.3, 01:02:05, Serial0/0
> C 132.1.23.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0/1
>
>
> Is there anything wrong that you can find, As per the lab only the
> summary route should be present. But I am getting all the routes. In
> the solution guide there isnt much about these issues.
>
> Regards
> shamin
>
>
> On 4/17/06, Brian McGahan <bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com> wrote:
> > Did you disable auto-summary under EIGRP?
> >
> > Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
> > bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
> >
> > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> > Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
> > Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
> > 24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
> > Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
Behalf
> > Of
> > > Mohammed Shameen Abdul Jabbar
> > > Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 2:19 PM
> > > To: Cisco certification
> > > Subject: IEWB VER3.0 LAB-2 TASK-4.6
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am using the IEWB VER3.0. Doing LAB-2 TASK-4.6.
> > > It requires to do a " ip summary-address eigrp ..." command under
a
> > > ethernet
> > > sub-interface.
> > > The problem i face is that , I am not able to see the route I am
> > > summarising in the routing table of other routers,
> > > I followed the solution guide also, but not able to get it work.
> > > In the lab workbook it is dome on a Gigabit ethernet sub interface
> > where
> > > as
> > > I am using normal ethernet sub-interface. Will this be of any
> > > implications?.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > shamin
> > >
> > >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:57 GMT-3