From: Brian Dennis (bdennis@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Mon Apr 10 2006 - 00:38:15 GMT-3
Actually you can still do both. Below is a configuration showing a router (R3) configured as a Frame Relay switch and as an "end point" in the same network.
Rack1R1#sho run int s0/1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 175 bytes
!
interface Serial0/1
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay map ip 10.1.1.2 121 broadcast
frame-relay map ip 10.1.1.3 131 broadcast
end
Rack1R1#
Rack1R2#sho run int s0/1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 175 bytes
!
interface Serial0/1
ip address 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay map ip 10.1.1.1 121 broadcast
frame-relay map ip 10.1.1.3 232 broadcast
end
Rack1R2#
Rack1R3#sho run | in frame-relay switching
frame-relay switching
Rack1R3#sho run int s1/2
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 223 bytes
!
interface Serial1/2
ip address 10.1.1.3 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
clockrate 64000
frame-relay map ip 10.1.1.1 131 broadcast
frame-relay intf-type dce
frame-relay route 121 interface Serial1/3 121
end
Rack1R3#sho run int s1/3
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 223 bytes
!
interface Serial1/3
ip address 10.1.1.3 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
clockrate 64000
frame-relay map ip 10.1.1.2 232 broadcast
frame-relay intf-type dce
frame-relay route 121 interface Serial1/2 121
end
Rack1R3#
Rack1R1#ping 10.1.1.2
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.1.1.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 56/57/60 ms
Rack1R1#ping 10.1.1.3
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.1.1.3, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 28/29/32 ms
Rack1R1#
Rack1AS>2
[Resuming connection 2 to r2 ... ]
Rack1R2#ping 10.1.1.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.1.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 56/56/60 ms
Rack1R2#ping 10.1.1.3
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.1.1.3, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 28/29/32 ms
Rack1R2#
Rack1AS>3
[Resuming connection 3 to r3 ... ]
Rack1R3#ping 10.1.1.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.1.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 28/29/32 ms
Rack1R3#ping 10.1.1.2
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.1.1.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 28/31/32 ms
Rack1R3#
HTH,
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Morris [mailto:swm@emanon.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2006 5:16 PM
To: 'Victor Cappuccio'; 'Schulz, Dave'
Cc: Brian Dennis; 'James Simons'; 'Cisco certification'
Subject: RE: Directly conneted frame-relay
If you don't issue and "frame-relay route" commands, then you can still
participate in the frame-relay directly. As soon as you choose to set up
L2 virtual circuits though, you are correct Dave in that you are no longer
playing at Layer 3.
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: Victor Cappuccio [mailto:cvictor@protokolgroup.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2006 2:09 AM
To: Schulz, Dave
Cc: Scott Morris; Brian Dennis; James Simons; Cisco certification
Subject: Re: Directly conneted frame-relay
Dave, I had the same misconcept, but my FRSW is working like a normal router
running OSPF / BGP / Mcast ...
BTW is the BB2 of the IE Rack...
Schulz, Dave escribis:
> However, doesn't the use of frame-switching on the router....cause the
router
> to cease functioning as a router and begin to function as a frame switch?
>
> Dave
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com on behalf of Scott Morris
> Sent: Sun 4/9/2006 12:49 AM
> To: 'Brian Dennis'; 'James Simons'; 'Cisco certification'
> Subject: RE: Directly conneted frame-relay
>
>
>
> True. The answer was to the config present.
>
> Either way, the config was missing. ;)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Dennis [mailto:bdennis@internetworkexpert.com]
> Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2006 12:31 AM
> To: Scott Morris; James Simons; Cisco certification
> Subject: RE: Directly conneted frame-relay
>
> Back-to-back Frame Relay can be done with or without LMI.
>
> http://www.internetworkexpert.com/resources/backtoback-framerelay.htm
>
> Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
> bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Scott Morris
> Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2006 5:37 PM
> To: 'James Simons'; 'Cisco certification'
> Subject: RE: Directly conneted frame-relay
>
> One of those small things in life called LMI. ;) No frame switch = no
> LMI...
>
> Check out:
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk713/tk237/technologies_configuration_e
> xamp
> le09186a0080094a3b.shtml
>
>
> Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
> #153, CISSP, et al.
> CCSI/JNCI
> IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
> IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> swm@emanon.com/smorris@ipexpert.com
> http://www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> James Simons
> Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2006 8:28 PM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: Directly conneted frame-relay
>
> hello all,
>
> I am trying to configure a frame-relay connection between two directly
> connected routers. I believe what I have should work but when I do flap
the
> interface, the line protocol comes up for a few seconds and then goes back
> down. Is there ayway to do this without using PPPoFR? my config is below.
>
> thanks,
>
> jimmy
>
> R1----------
>
> int s0/0
> no ip address
> encapsulation frame-relay
> clockrate 64000
>
> int s0/0.1 point-to-point
> ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
> frame-relay interface-dlci 100
>
> R2------------
> int s0/0
> no ip address
> encapsulation frame-relay
>
> int s0/0.1 point-to-point
> ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0
> frame-relay interface-dlci 100
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:56 GMT-3