From: Victor Cappuccio (cvictor@protokolgroup.com)
Date: Sun Apr 09 2006 - 03:08:53 GMT-3
Dave, I had the same misconcept, but my FRSW is working like a normal
router running OSPF / BGP / Mcast ...
BTW is the BB2 of the IE Rack...
Schulz, Dave escribis:
> However, doesn't the use of frame-switching on the router....cause the router
> to cease functioning as a router and begin to function as a frame switch?
>
> Dave
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com on behalf of Scott Morris
> Sent: Sun 4/9/2006 12:49 AM
> To: 'Brian Dennis'; 'James Simons'; 'Cisco certification'
> Subject: RE: Directly conneted frame-relay
>
>
>
> True. The answer was to the config present.
>
> Either way, the config was missing. ;)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Dennis [mailto:bdennis@internetworkexpert.com]
> Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2006 12:31 AM
> To: Scott Morris; James Simons; Cisco certification
> Subject: RE: Directly conneted frame-relay
>
> Back-to-back Frame Relay can be done with or without LMI.
>
> http://www.internetworkexpert.com/resources/backtoback-framerelay.htm
>
> Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
> bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Scott Morris
> Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2006 5:37 PM
> To: 'James Simons'; 'Cisco certification'
> Subject: RE: Directly conneted frame-relay
>
> One of those small things in life called LMI. ;) No frame switch = no
> LMI...
>
> Check out:
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk713/tk237/technologies_configuration_e
> xamp
> le09186a0080094a3b.shtml
>
>
> Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
> #153, CISSP, et al.
> CCSI/JNCI
> IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
> IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> swm@emanon.com/smorris@ipexpert.com
> http://www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> James Simons
> Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2006 8:28 PM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: Directly conneted frame-relay
>
> hello all,
>
> I am trying to configure a frame-relay connection between two directly
> connected routers. I believe what I have should work but when I do flap the
> interface, the line protocol comes up for a few seconds and then goes back
> down. Is there ayway to do this without using PPPoFR? my config is below.
>
> thanks,
>
> jimmy
>
> R1----------
>
> int s0/0
> no ip address
> encapsulation frame-relay
> clockrate 64000
>
> int s0/0.1 point-to-point
> ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
> frame-relay interface-dlci 100
>
> R2------------
> int s0/0
> no ip address
> encapsulation frame-relay
>
> int s0/0.1 point-to-point
> ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0
> frame-relay interface-dlci 100
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:56 GMT-3