P-t-P or P-t-M?

From: simone schiassi (simone.ciscolab@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Mar 28 2006 - 15:00:51 GMT-3

• Next message: Aaron T. Woland: "RE: Cisco security perimeter!! :("
• Previous message: simone schiassi: "P-t-P or P-t-M?"
• Next in thread: Brian McGahan: "RE: P-t-P or P-t-M?"
• Maybe reply: Brian McGahan: "RE: P-t-P or P-t-M?"
• Maybe reply: Aaron T. Woland: "RE: P-t-P or P-t-M?"
• Maybe reply: simone schiassi: "Re: P-t-P or P-t-M?"
• Maybe reply: Brian McGahan: "RE: P-t-P or P-t-M?"
• Maybe reply: simone schiassi: "Re: P-t-P or P-t-M?"
• Maybe reply: simone schiassi: "Re: P-t-P or P-t-M?"
• Maybe reply: simone schiassi: "Re: P-t-P or P-t-M?"
• Maybe reply: Alexei Monastyrnyi: "Re: P-t-P or P-t-M?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

How's better to confiugre a physical interface for a frame-relay link with
ospf that goes from a physical serial interface to a single subinterface on
the other router? point to point or point to multipoint?

I'm asking this because I read somewhere that configuring point to point on
a physical interface could create addictive issues.

• Next message: Aaron T. Woland: "RE: Cisco security perimeter!! :("
• Previous message: simone schiassi: "P-t-P or P-t-M?"
• Next in thread: Brian McGahan: "RE: P-t-P or P-t-M?"
• Maybe reply: Brian McGahan: "RE: P-t-P or P-t-M?"
• Maybe reply: Aaron T. Woland: "RE: P-t-P or P-t-M?"
• Maybe reply: simone schiassi: "Re: P-t-P or P-t-M?"
• Maybe reply: Brian McGahan: "RE: P-t-P or P-t-M?"
• Maybe reply: simone schiassi: "Re: P-t-P or P-t-M?"
• Maybe reply: simone schiassi: "Re: P-t-P or P-t-M?"
• Maybe reply: simone schiassi: "Re: P-t-P or P-t-M?"
• Maybe reply: Alexei Monastyrnyi: "Re: P-t-P or P-t-M?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 01 2006 - 10:07:40 GMT-3