From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Tue Mar 28 2006 - 15:12:13 GMT-3
Design-wise point-to-point subnets with point-to-point
subinterfaces are the best way to go. If you're asking within the
context of the CCIE lab the answer is a little more complex. Since p2p
is the easiest design-wise you should familiarize yourself with the
other variations for lab preparation purposes.
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> simone schiassi
> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 11:59 AM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: P-t-P or P-t-M?
>
> How's better to confiugre a physical interface for a frame-relay link
> with
> ospf that goes from a physical serial interface to a single
subinterface
> on
> the other router? point to point or point to multipoint?
>
> I'm asking this because I read somewhere that configuring point to
point
> on
> a physical interface could create addictive issues.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 01 2006 - 10:07:40 GMT-3