From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Tue Mar 28 2006 - 18:52:31 GMT-3
What is the difference in the OSPF network type between a main
interface and a point-to-point subinterface? How does this affect your
design considerations?
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
>
>
> Could a point to point subinterface from one side to a physical point
to
> point to the other bring to particular behaviours to consider with
ospf?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> simone schiassi
> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 12:53 PM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: P-t-P or P-t-M?
>
> 2006/3/28, Brian McGahan <bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com>:
> >
> > Design-wise point-to-point subnets with point-to-point
> > subinterfaces are the best way to go. If you're asking within the
> > context of the CCIE lab the answer is a little more complex. Since
p2p
> > is the easiest design-wise you should familiarize yourself with the
> > other variations for lab preparation purposes.
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> > Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
> > bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
> >
> > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> > Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
> > Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
> > 24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
> > Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 01 2006 - 10:07:40 GMT-3