From: Brad Ellis (brad@ccbootcamp.com)
Date: Mon Mar 27 2006 - 16:27:45 GMT-3
Tim,
Have you checked out the new ASA box (Cisco ASA 5500 Series Content Security
and Control Security Services Module )?
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_data_sheet0900aecd80402e4f.html
It does URL filtering and a lot more.
To answer your question, yes, I've seen a lot more installs with Websense
then I have with N2H2. I've personally installed Websense three times from
scratch and it was a piece of cake. If you're looking at selling a content
filter, however, sell the ASA5500...Im sure you're local CAM will love ya.
:)
thanks,
Brad Ellis
CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security)
CCSI#30482
Network Learning Inc - A Cisco Learning Partner (CLP)
YES! We take Cisco Learning credits!
brad@ccbootcamp.com
www.ccbootcamp.com (Cisco Training and Advanced Technology Rental Racks)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>; "Cisco certification"
<security@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 8:39 AM
Subject: Websense vs N2H2 [bcc][faked-from]
Hi guys,
I'm looking for opinions on which of the above content filters is better.
I know that both are supported by Cisco PIX firewalls but I don't have first
hand experience with either of them.
If the answers is, "It depends.", can you provide some high level criteria
to based a decision on?
Over the years, I've gotten the gut impression that Websense is the more
popular of the two but that might have more to do with my limited exposure.
TIA, Tim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 01 2006 - 10:07:40 GMT-3