From: Vincent Mashburn (vmashburn@fedex.com)
Date: Tue Mar 21 2006 - 11:12:33 GMT-3
If you "match protocol rtp", that would definitely take care of the
media stream, but you still have to look at the control traffic. Also,
if you wanted to treat voice and video differently (ie give voice a
little better priority), then some additional classification would be
necessary.
Vince Mashburn
Voice / Data Engineer
901-263-5072
Cisco IP Telephony Support Specialist
CCNP, CCDA,Network +
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Bill.McKenzie@bisys.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 4:16 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Video and Voice
Would matching rtp be the best way to encompass both video (H.323) and
VOIP traffic when doing QOS on a link?
Thanks,
Bill
Bill McKenzie
Network Support
BISYS Fund Services
Work: 614.428.3293
Cell: 614.425.2370
"Exceeding Client Expectations"
============================================
STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments
to
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and
may
contain confidential or privileged information. No representation is
made
on its accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this
electronic message. Certain assumptions may have been made in the
preparation of this material as of this date, and are subject to change
without notice. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail
and
any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited.
Please reply to the sender and destroy all copies of this message and
any
attachments from your system.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 01 2006 - 10:07:39 GMT-3