From: Chris Lewis (chrlewiscsco@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Mar 21 2006 - 11:09:36 GMT-3
That is certainly a good way to do it, as long as you bear in mind the
following port range allocation
from to application priority 0 16383 unclassified lowest 16384 32767 audio
highest 32768 49151 whiteboard medium 49152 65535 video low
On 3/21/06, Bill.McKenzie@bisys.com <Bill.McKenzie@bisys.com> wrote:
>
> Would matching rtp be the best way to encompass both video (H.323) and
> VOIP traffic when doing QOS on a link?
>
> Thanks,
> Bill
>
>
> Bill McKenzie
> Network Support
> BISYS Fund Services
> Work: 614.428.3293
> Cell: 614.425.2370
>
> "Exceeding Client Expectations"
> ============================================
> STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY
>
> The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments
> to
> this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and
> may
> contain confidential or privileged information. No representation is made
> on its accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this
> electronic message. Certain assumptions may have been made in the
> preparation of this material as of this date, and are subject to change
> without notice. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail
> and
> any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited.
>
> Please reply to the sender and destroy all copies of this message and any
> attachments from your system.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 01 2006 - 10:07:39 GMT-3