Re: Multicast Helper map...Which method is right?

From: Ramiro Garza (ccie15xxx@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Mar 09 2006 - 00:43:46 GMT-3

• Next message: Aaron T. Woland: "RE: CCIE 2006"
• Previous message: HM C: "CCIE 2006"
• Maybe in reply to: Roberto Fernandez: "Multicast Helper map...Which method is right?"
• Next in thread: Ivan: "Re: Multicast Helper map...Which method is right?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

No, they are not the same. I once had the same doubt, I did set up a lab,
did some testing and I can assure you that the doc cd is totally wrong
and IEWB is absolutely right.

Regards
Ramiro Garza

On 3/7/06, Roberto Fernandez <rofernandez@us.telefonica.com> wrote:
>
> Friends,
>
> There is an apparent contradiction between the solutions at IEWB and the
> Command Reference Guides.
>
> At IEWB solutions the "ip helper map" is configured at the "incoming
> interface" on the "egress router". On the other hand, Command Reference
> puts it on the "egress interface"
>
> Are both the same?
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Roberto
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

• Next message: Aaron T. Woland: "RE: CCIE 2006"
• Previous message: HM C: "CCIE 2006"
• Maybe in reply to: Roberto Fernandez: "Multicast Helper map...Which method is right?"
• Next in thread: Ivan: "Re: Multicast Helper map...Which method is right?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 01 2006 - 10:07:38 GMT-3