From: Chris Lewis (chrlewiscsco@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Mar 02 2006 - 18:59:44 GMT-3
If you have a single DLCI on an interface, you can configure MQC and apply
the service policy directly to the interface, so it is not necessary to
create a map-class first to assign the service-policy to.
In your configuration below, you would not want to use the frame relay
traffic shaping command on the interface. Either use frame relay traffic
shaping (implying the use of cir and mincir to set teh shaping parameters)
or use MQC shape command, not both. As your requirements do not specify any
shaping is needed, FRTS is not needed.
Chris
On 3/2/06, jnkmail4eva@yahoo.com <jnkmail4eva@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Before I try this in my lab, I thought I ask those willing to share their
> wisdom.
>
> Is it ALWAYS necessary to use map-classs when allocating bandwith ?
>
> For Example, I have router A with S0/0 connected to our FR provider.
> I want to dedicate 80% of our bandwidth for all traffic going out.
> and leave the 20% available all the time (I want to allocate it for
> Mainframe
> at a later time i.e undecided). If there is congestion, drop packets.
>
> I know I could create a policy-map and then appply it to the interface
> class-map all
> match ip any any
> policy-map test
> class all
> bandwidth 80
> random detect
> int s0/0
> frame-relay traffic shaping
> service-policy output test
> Will this work ?
>
> Is it necessary for me to create a
> map-class first, apply the policy map to it and then apply it to the
> frame-relay interface as a frame-relay class.
>
> I am quite confused.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 01 2006 - 10:07:37 GMT-3