Re: Frame-relay QoS

From: Ivan (ivan@iip.net)
Date: Fri Mar 03 2006 - 06:45:32 GMT-3

• Next message: PANDI MOORTHY: "I thought bridging already removed from the exam, Do I still"
• Previous message: Jung-I Lin: "Re: DoIt labs vs. IP Expert Labs"
• Maybe in reply to: jnkmail4eva@yahoo.com: "Frame-relay QoS"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Chris !

   If I use MQC and inside MQC shape action (not policy).
   Do I need frame-relay traffic-shaping on physical interface ?

> In your configuration below, you would not want to use the frame relay
> traffic shaping command on the interface. Either use frame relay traffic
> shaping (implying the use of cir and mincir to set teh shaping parameters)
> or use MQC shape command, not both. As your requirements do not specify any
> shaping is needed, FRTS is not needed.

-- 
Ivan

• Next message: PANDI MOORTHY: "I thought bridging already removed from the exam, Do I still"
• Previous message: Jung-I Lin: "Re: DoIt labs vs. IP Expert Labs"
• Maybe in reply to: jnkmail4eva@yahoo.com: "Frame-relay QoS"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 01 2006 - 10:07:37 GMT-3