From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Fri Feb 24 2006 - 11:03:18 GMT-3
In your case other VLANs besides VLAN 8 will not be able to go over
Fa0/13. Otherwise you're essentially accomplishing the same thing.
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> jellyboy
> Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 2:34 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: IEWB Lab4 1.3 Traffic Control
>
> Hi all, The task asks for traffic belonging to Vlan8 to be assigned to
> port
> fa0/13 and all other trunk links should not receive Vlan8. The Brians
> solution involves removing Vlan8 from the prune eligible list:
>
> #switchport trunk pruning vlan 2-7,9-1001
>
> I can understand the logic behind this, but I originally came up with:
>
> interface FastEthernet0/13
> switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
> switchport trunk native vlan 36
> switchport trunk allowed vlan 8 <<
> switchport mode trunk
> !
> interface FastEthernet0/14
> switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
> switchport trunk native vlan 36
> switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-7,9-4094 <<
> switchport mode trunk
> !
> interface FastEthernet0/15
> switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
> switchport trunk native vlan 36
> switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-7,9-4094 <<
> switchport mode trunk
>
> I am wondering if what I did accomplishes the same thing?
> If not what are the suttle (or obvious!!) differences? Apart from the
> static
> allocation of vlans on a trunk.
>
>
> Many Thanks,
>
> JB
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Mar 01 2006 - 11:28:18 GMT-3