From: Tony (asalgado@comcast.net)
Date: Fri Feb 03 2006 - 17:00:37 GMT-3
Thanks. Looking into it now....
tony
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Brent Foster
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 1:49 PM
To: Tony; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Q in Q VLAN Tagging
Have you looked at L2TPv3?
--- Tony <asalgado@comcast.net> wrote:
> This may seem to be a little off the list topic, but
> I've not been able to
> find some solutions to my problem. The division I'm
> in is a small service
> provider mostly retail industry. We have 2
> geographically dispersed data
> center and we want to use a single VLAN to support
> customers who have
> multiple VLAN's just as if they were connected
> directly. However, our data
> center is not connected directly. The only
> connection is through the
> internet. I looked at Q-in-Q Tag Termination which
> support PPPoE, however,
> in my understanding, transit path should be able to
> bridge the traffic.
> Since our only p-t-p connection is over GRE/VPN, I
> don't know of other means
> to tunnel ethernet between the 2 locations just as
> if they were connected
> directly.
>
>
>
> Would appreciate your thoughts on this?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tony
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Mar 01 2006 - 11:28:17 GMT-3