From: Brian Dennis (bdennis@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Sun Jan 29 2006 - 20:26:49 GMT-3
Don't argue with the lab. Just do what it says. Nothing more and
nothing less. If you have any questions or concerns about the wording
of a task ask the proctor but don't get into "semantics" with the
proctor about something like this.
HTH,
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
CCIEin2006
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 2:07 PM
To: Hash Aminu
Cc: Faryar Zabihi (fzabihi); ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: IRWB-RSv3 LAB 1 task 1.3/1.4
Wait a minute...couldn't it be argued that the lab failed to say "do not
configure on non-user ports" or configure it "ONLY" on user ports?
One could also argue that since the router is not participating in SPT
there
is no reason for it to wait for forwarding delay...
On 1/29/06, Hash Aminu <hashng@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> thank you zaheed , i can see why eople fail the LAB so many times
*SMIRK*
>
> On 1/28/06, Faryar Zabihi (fzabihi) <fzabihi@cisco.com> wrote:
> > The requirement says to let "users" that plug into the switch
should
> > not have to wait for forwarding delay. Since fa0/2 is connected to
a
> > router, users will not plug into that port. KEY - users in vlan 2.
> >
> >
> > Faryar Zabihi
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> > Hashiru Aminu
> > Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2006 2:57 PM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: IRWB-RSv3 LAB 1 task 1.3/1.4
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> > Looking through the requirement of task 1.3 and 1.4 we are to enable
> > portfast and BPDUguard for ports in VLAN 2.n the solution guide the
> > features were enabled on fa0/10 and fa0/11 but going back to the
table
> > of VLAN/Port assignment on of the LAB SW1 fa0/2 connected to Fa0/0
of R2
> > is in VLAN 2.
> > I believe the solution should include fa0/2 of SW1.
> > I hope im not reading too much in to the requirements.
> > I stand to be corrected.
> > Someone with better understanding should shade some light on this
> > please.
> > TIA
> >
>
>
> --
> B.Eng, MCP,CCNA, CCNP
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 01 2006 - 07:45:50 GMT-3