2950 emi vs smi!

From: KSGoh (kianseng.goh@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Dec 12 2005 - 12:19:15 GMT-3

• Next message: Andrew Lissitz \(alissitz\): "RE: ISIS - set-attached-bit and set-overload-bit"
• Previous message: Arun Arumuganainar: "Re: ISIS - set-attached-bit and set-overload-bit"
• Next in thread: Victor Cappuccio: "RE: 2950 emi vs smi!"
• Maybe reply: Victor Cappuccio: "RE: 2950 emi vs smi!"
• Maybe reply: Farrukh Haroon: "Re: 2950 emi vs smi!"
• Maybe reply: Farrukh Haroon: "Re: 2950 emi vs smi!"
• Maybe reply: Raghavan Kasturirangan \(rkasturi\): "RE: 2950 emi vs smi!"
• Maybe reply: Curt Girardin: "RE: 2950 emi vs smi!"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

anyone can help to highlight what's the differences between 2950 emi and smi
?

• Next message: Andrew Lissitz \(alissitz\): "RE: ISIS - set-attached-bit and set-overload-bit"
• Previous message: Arun Arumuganainar: "Re: ISIS - set-attached-bit and set-overload-bit"
• Next in thread: Victor Cappuccio: "RE: 2950 emi vs smi!"
• Maybe reply: Victor Cappuccio: "RE: 2950 emi vs smi!"
• Maybe reply: Farrukh Haroon: "Re: 2950 emi vs smi!"
• Maybe reply: Farrukh Haroon: "Re: 2950 emi vs smi!"
• Maybe reply: Raghavan Kasturirangan \(rkasturi\): "RE: 2950 emi vs smi!"
• Maybe reply: Curt Girardin: "RE: 2950 emi vs smi!"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jan 09 2006 - 07:07:51 GMT-3