From: Farrukh Haroon (farrukhharoon@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Dec 12 2005 - 12:50:15 GMT-3
Dear Victor, the differences you mentioned (at least most of them) are only
relevant when talking about multi-layer switches, not the 2950... it doesnt
have any routing support
However, the second link is very useful
HTH
On 12/12/05, Victor Cappuccio <cvictor@protokolgroup.com> wrote:
>
> Hello KSGoh,
>
> EMI has support for routing protocols OSPF, EIGRP, ISIS & BGP - whereas
> the
> SMI only supports RIP & Static routes. The EMI image also supports
> Multicast routing, the SMI only support IGMP snooping so requires an
> external router to forward multicast.
>
> I once had a couple of 2950 that came with SMI Image and I tried to
> upgrade
> it to a EMI Image (for testing purposes), and I remember to received a
> ASCI
> Error, I think it depends on the switch model There are many 2950 model
> (T,
> M ect)
>
> More explanation on the difference between SMI & EMI
>
>
www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps646/products_configuration_exampl
> e09186a0080169623.shtml
>
> Catalyst 2950 Series Software Feature Comparison--SI and EI
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps628/prod_bulletin09186a008
> 00b3089.html
>
> HTH
>
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] En nombre de
> KSGoh
> Enviado el: lunes, 12 de diciembre de 2005 11:19
> Para: Cisco certification
> Asunto: 2950 emi vs smi!
>
> anyone can help to highlight what's the differences between 2950 emi and
> smi
> ?
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jan 09 2006 - 07:07:51 GMT-3