From: Anthony Sequeira (terry.francona@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Dec 03 2005 - 13:47:47 GMT-3
Without violating the NDA - let me make it clear (having seen the actual lab
way too many times) - there are plenty of mistakes in the Cisco lab.
PLENTY!
You will see grammatical mistakes, base configuration inconsistencies, and
other goofs.
The proctors will, as usual, shrug when these are pointed out. They will
quickly say that you have to deal with mistakes in the real world as well.
On 12/3/05, Hash Aminu <hashng@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Anthony,
>
> hmmn! thats the authors mistakes not your, AFAIK if it is in the LAB cisco
> will never forget to do that. when it comes to the popular dilema of having
> loopbacks placed as desired they usually have less consequence as far as
the
> lab requirement goes, but sometimes especially if you have things like the
> virtual-links may be you have to give it a thought.
> but which protocol are you redistributing into? what of if the router is a
> redistribution point of two or more protocols how would you combat that
> issue.
> for your own case you can post which author/book is that and i believe
> alot of people in this group have encountered that scenario. that would be
> more clearly, else the answer is the normal "IT DEPENDS"
> HTH
> Hashiru
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jan 09 2006 - 07:07:50 GMT-3