From: Schulz, Dave (DSchulz@dpsciences.com)
Date: Sat Dec 03 2005 - 13:43:31 GMT-3
Good question.....Would there ever be a case in the real lab that doesn't have
the interface assigned to the protocol....meaning, the lab author expects you
to make that decision? any thoughts from the experts?
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com
To: Cisco certification
Sent: 12/3/2005 11:11 AM
Subject: Interface Not in Protocol
What if a practice lab author forgets to take an interface and do
anything
with it as far as a dynamic protocol goes. Most often - the overall lab
requirement is for full reachability of all of your networks in the
diagram.
So - you quickly realize that you better do something with the
interface!
After giving this a lot of thought - I have decided that when in doubt -
the
best option would be to take this "forgotten" interface and enter it in
a
protocol using redistribution. Specifically, do redistribution of
connected
and reference a route-map if needed to limit the redistribution to the
single interface.
What does everyone else think about this approach? I think that applying
a
new network statement in a routing protocol is just too dangerous of a
configuration from a grading perspective.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jan 09 2006 - 07:07:50 GMT-3