From: Montiean (noktes@bellsouth.net)
Date: Sun Nov 27 2005 - 22:39:37 GMT-3
There 's solution using NAT that Chris has posted not a long time ago. Might
be a choice if you get this weird question in lab.
Montiean
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eddie Parra" <eddie.parra@gmail.com>
To: "Primetek_Easyman" <easyman@primetek.com.tw>
Cc: "GroupStudy CCIE-Lab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2005 8:35 PM
Subject: Re: Eigrp Secondary address question ?
> No. You will get a "not on common subnet" error.
>
> -Eddie
>
> On 11/27/05, Primetek_Easyman <easyman@primetek.com.tw> wrote:
>> Dear Group Study gurus:
>>
>> I have a question about secondary address issue in eigrp.
>> Is it possible to forming adjacency from different primary network
>> addresses
>> on two routers?
>> This is an imaginary scenario.
>> Say two routers -- R1 and R2
>>
>> R1(e0/0) -----------------(e0/0)R2
>>
>> R1
>> Interface e0/0
>> Ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
>> Ip address 1.1.2.1 255.255.255.0 secondary
>> Router eigrp 1
>> Network 1.0.0.0
>>
>> R2
>> Interface e0/0
>> Ip address 1.1.2.2 255.255.255.0
>> Router eigrp 1
>> Network 1.0.0.0
>>
>> In rip world we have an option called "no validate-update-source" to
>> conquer
>> this restriction.
>> But after searching the CCO I could not find the equivalent as above in
>> eigrp world.
>>
>> Can we still have the adjacency forming up without change the primary or
>> secondary address?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Lin
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:12:08 GMT-3