From: Daniel Berlinski (Daniel.Berlinski@telecom.co.nz)
Date: Tue Nov 15 2005 - 00:25:10 GMT-3
Niche
I see your point but I can't do a class-default in this scenario. I get a:
QoS: Mixing of VLAN classes and non-VLAN classes is not allowed.
QoS: Policy-map MARKING failed checking.
Policymap is detached from the interface(s).
Doc CD says: "You cannot configure both port-based classification and VLAN-based classification at the same time. When you configure the match vlan vlan-list command, the class map becomes per-port per-VLAN based. If you configure a policy map that contains both port-based and VLAN-based class maps, the switch rejects the policy map when you attach it to an interface"
Any suggestions?
________________________________
From: Niche [mailto:jackyliu419@gmail.com]
Sent: Tue 15/11/2005 4:19 p.m.
To: Daniel Berlinski
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: 3550 QoS Marking
Hi there,
"mls qos cos 3" will not kick-in cause your port is not a trunk port (and I assume that port is not connecting to a 7960). You can use class-default for marking remaining traffic to precedence 3.
Cheers~
Jacky
On 11/15/05, Daniel Berlinski <Daniel.Berlinski@telecom.co.nz> wrote:
Hi everyone.
Will the following configs mark HTTP traffic coming from vlan 12 with precedence 5 and mark the remaining traffic with precedence 3?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
mls qos
access-list 170 permit tcp any any eq www
class-map match-any HTTP
match access-group 170
class-map match-all VLAN12
match vlan 12
match class-map HTTP
policy-map MARKING
class VLAN12
set ip precedence 5
interface FastEthernet0/2
switchport access vlan 12
switchport mode access
mls qos cos 3
service-policy input MARKING
Rack1SW1#sh mls qos inter fa0/2
FastEthernet0/2
Attached policy-map for Ingress: MARKING
trust state: not trusted
trust mode: not trusted
COS override: dis
default COS: 3
DSCP Mutation Map: Default DSCP Mutation Map
trust device: none
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From the documentation CD: "You cannot configure both port-based classification and VLAN-based classification at the same time. When you configure the match vlan vlan-list command, the class map becomes per-port per-VLAN based. If you configure a policy map that contains both port-based and VLAN-based class maps, the switch rejects the policy map when you attach it to an interface"
Will "mls qos cos 3" under the interface mark the remaining traffic with precedence 3?
Best regards
This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you. Please note that this communication does not designate an information system for the purposes of the Electronic Transactions Act 2002.
_______________________________________________________________________
Subscription information may be found at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:12:06 GMT-3