From: Danny Cox (dandermanuk@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Nov 13 2005 - 11:38:31 GMT-3
> Using a ip local policy-map & route-map, then setting the next hop to
> 'interface tunnel14' would have been the preferred solution, but for some
> reason that is not working in my lab.
Having re-read the email I sent, I see I worded it badly - this is
what I meant. I'm ingtrigued that it didn't work for you. I'll try
to lab it up.
> The solution that will work is to set the tunnel source to a local interface
> (eg ethernet or serial, must be advertised by IGP) & the tunnel destination
> ip to the remote router's local interface (advertised by IGP). Then let IGP
> advetise the loopback0 of both routers and do a bgp neighbor peering using
> the loopback0 ip address of the other router and also using the bgp multihop
> option, this worked for me even without the multihop option.
I think I'm misunderstanding you. What makes this force BGP traffic
down the tunnel? Do you mean that traffic to the loopback0 is routed
via the tunnel according to the IGP, whereas traffic destined for
other interfaces follows the usual IGP rules?
cheers
Danny
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:12:06 GMT-3