( SP CCIE) MP BGP among PE's

From: Jongsoo (bstrt2004@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Oct 29 2005 - 20:52:53 GMT-3

Next message: Andrew Lissitz \(alissitz\): "RE: ( SP CCIE) MP BGP among PE's"
Previous message: Jongsoo: "FRF.9 payload compression...in Frame-relay inside of GRE tunnel"
Next in thread: Andrew Lissitz \(alissitz\): "RE: ( SP CCIE) MP BGP among PE's"
Maybe reply: Andrew Lissitz \(alissitz\): "RE: ( SP CCIE) MP BGP among PE's"
Maybe reply: Jongsoo: "Re: ( SP CCIE) MP BGP among PE's"
Maybe reply: Jongsoo: "Re: ( SP CCIE) MP BGP among PE's"
Maybe reply: Andrew Lissitz \(alissitz\): "RE: ( SP CCIE) MP BGP among PE's"
Maybe reply: Jongsoo: "Re: ( SP CCIE) MP BGP among PE's"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Let's say there are one VRF "A" and four PE's and each of PE has one
physical connection belonging to VRF A.
The question is in order to make a full reachability of VRF A networks
among all four PE, the full MP bgp connection by creating 6 MP-BGP session
is a MUST?
Thanks
Jongsoo

Next message: Andrew Lissitz \(alissitz\): "RE: ( SP CCIE) MP BGP among PE's"
Previous message: Jongsoo: "FRF.9 payload compression...in Frame-relay inside of GRE tunnel"
Next in thread: Andrew Lissitz \(alissitz\): "RE: ( SP CCIE) MP BGP among PE's"
Maybe reply: Andrew Lissitz \(alissitz\): "RE: ( SP CCIE) MP BGP among PE's"
Maybe reply: Jongsoo: "Re: ( SP CCIE) MP BGP among PE's"
Maybe reply: Jongsoo: "Re: ( SP CCIE) MP BGP among PE's"
Maybe reply: Andrew Lissitz \(alissitz\): "RE: ( SP CCIE) MP BGP among PE's"
Maybe reply: Jongsoo: "Re: ( SP CCIE) MP BGP among PE's"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:55 GMT-3