From: Jongsoo (bstrt2004@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Oct 29 2005 - 21:46:27 GMT-3
Thanks Andrew and I got it.
Basically, it works as a similar way as iBGP
The workbook I purchased last wek and am studying now is very poor.
But I say ...better than nothing...I am even validating the solution as well
Jongsoo
On 10/29/05, Andrew Lissitz (alissitz) <alissitz@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Good evening Jongsoo,
>
> Vpnv4 routes need to be propagated to each PE that has this VRFA. On
> one of the PEs, you can do a show ip route vrf VRFA and see the routes.
> This routing table needs to be converged, and thus you need the routes
> from the other PEs. You will get these routes via mpibgp sessions with
> other PEs or RRs.
>
> It is easier to use RRs and this way you are only creating a session
> with the RR, and from the RR to the other PEs ... But of course you
> already know this MR CCIE ;-)
>
> Does this answer your question Jongsoo?
>
> Andrew
>
> PS - Have you joined the comserv mail list? I joined both ;-)
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Jongsoo
> Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2005 7:53 PM
> To: FORUM
> Subject: ( SP CCIE) MP BGP among PE's
>
> Let's say there are one VRF "A" and four PE's and each of PE has one
> physical connection belonging to VRF A.
> The question is in order to make a full reachability of VRF A networks
> among all four PE, the full MP bgp connection by creating 6 MP-BGP
> session is a MUST?
> Thanks
> Jongsoo
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:55 GMT-3