RE: Name the socket used for BGP?

From: Adam S. Roth (adam@therothfamily.net)
Date: Mon Sep 12 2005 - 21:33:51 GMT-3


I found out the answer is 179. Was it really that bad of a question? No
one response. I know it seemed pretty simple and I know my ports but when
they asked socket I wanted to make absolutely sure they were referring to
port. Commonly socket and Ports are interchangeable but when you look up the
link it can be confusing.

This email message and any attachments are intended for the use of the
addressee(s) indicated above. Information that is privileged or otherwise
confidential may be contained herein. If you are not the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, review, or use
of this message, documents, or information contained herein is strictly
prohibited.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Adam
S. Roth
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 11:07 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Name the socket used for BGP?

Group:

   I was recently asked a question "Name the socket used for BGP?"

Are they referring to 179?

If you look at this pasted from
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cscsupport/setup_guides/bgp.html

bgptest> sho os tcp
 
==========================================================================
                              TCP SESSION INFORMATION
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               Local Remote Remote
    Num Session Type State Socket Port Port IP Address
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
      1 SERVER (TELNET) LISTEN 80 23 0 0.0.0.0
      2 SERVER (BGP) LISTEN 81 179 0 0.0.0.0
      3 ACTIVE (BGP) ESTABLISH 82 20001 179 198.41.9.2
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    13 free TCBs out of 16.

It shows socket differently.

Thanks for your help!!



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 02 2005 - 14:40:14 GMT-3