From: Thomwin Chen (thomwin_chen@yahoo.com)
Date: Sat Aug 20 2005 - 05:38:58 GMT-3
Kumara,
I also had slightly similar question several months ago (replied by Chris and Bob).
http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200506/msg00730.html
perhaps, you might consider third alternative, MQC-Based FRTS.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122newft/122t/122t13/frqosmqc.htm
about your 1st alternative, I think it will be very rare to apply it directly.
Rgds,
Thomwin
kumara.shunmugam@wipro.com wrote:
Team
A quick Question, may be a silly question too, If you are asked to configure
a CBWFQ policy and apply it in to a Frame-relay interface, which method can we
choose ?
1. Apply Directly the "service policy..." command in the interface
2. Call the Service policy in Frame-relay Map-class and apply the "frame-relay
class" command in to the interface along with "frame-relay shaping" .
Can anyone give some suggestions on this...?
I think we can use both methods; the second method is particularly useful when
we already have a frame-relay map class is applied on the interface and we
need to apply one more policy-map for the same interface(physical interface).
Moreover, we can't directly apply service-policy in a frame-relay Sub
interface, hence use only the second method for sub-interface also.
Regards
Shun
Confidentiality Notice
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to
this message are intended
for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or
privileged information. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at Wipro or
Mailadmin@wipro.com immediately
and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:01:19 GMT-3