From: B Kim (beokim@comcast.net)
Date: Tue Jul 26 2005 - 11:44:53 GMT-3
Hi guys,
Thanks for your replies.
Actually it works fine now, with all aal5snap, aal5mux, and
aal5ciscoppp.
I do not know why ping didn't work yesterday. I reboots all systems and
just copy and paste the same configurations, and It works! Strange.
So my conclusions regarding PPPoA are:
1. The virtual interface types do not matter. Dialer on one end doesn't
bother with Virtual-Template on the other end because it is locally
significant.
2. Encapsulation types do matter. The encapsulation type on both ends
must be the same type. As long as they are the same, there is no
encapsulation issue.
Please correct me if I mislead anything.
Thanks
B. Kim
-----Original Message-----
From: ccie2be [mailto:ccie2be@nyc.rr.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 6:39 AM
To: 'B Kim'; 'CCIE Study Group'
Subject: RE: PPPoA Dialer <---> Virtual-Template
What happens if you use aal5mux as the encap on both sides?
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
B
Kim
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 10:00 PM
To: CCIE Study Group
Subject: PPPoA Dialer <---> Virtual-Template
Hi
I think PPPoA configured by Dialer interface on end and by the
Virtual-Template on the other end should work. But it doesn't in my lab
work.
Is it supposed to work or what is wrong with the configuration?
Any comment would be appreciated. Thanks.
R1:
!
interface ATM3/0
no ip address
no atm ilmi-keepalive
pvc 0/101
encapsulation aal5snap
protocol ppp dialer
dialer pool-member 1
!
!
interface Dialer1
ip address 10.1.12.1 255.255.255.0
encapsulation ppp
dialer pool 1
!
R2:
!
interface ATM3/0
no ip address
no atm ilmi-keepalive
pvc 0/101
encapsulation aal5snap
protocol ppp Virtual-Template1
!
!
interface Virtual-Template1
ip address 10.1.12.2 255.255.255.0
!
P.S.
When I configured the same type either Dialer or Virtual-Template on
both sides, then it works.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:00:31 GMT-3