RE: PPPoA Dialer <---> Virtual-Template

From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Tue Jul 26 2005 - 08:38:40 GMT-3

• Next message: Andrew Lissitz \(alissitz\): "RFC 2547 Link - SP CCIE links"
• Previous message: Thomwin Chen: "Re: Are we required to ping local FR interface ?"
• Maybe in reply to: B Kim: "PPPoA Dialer <---> Virtual-Template"
• Next in thread: Brian Lee: "Re: PPPoA Dialer <---> Virtual-Template"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

What happens if you use aal5mux as the encap on both sides?

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of B
Kim
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 10:00 PM
To: CCIE Study Group
Subject: PPPoA Dialer <---> Virtual-Template

Hi
 
I think PPPoA configured by Dialer interface on end and by the
Virtual-Template on the other end should work. But it doesn't in my lab
work.
 
Is it supposed to work or what is wrong with the configuration?
 
Any comment would be appreciated. Thanks.
 
R1:
!
interface ATM3/0
 no ip address
 no atm ilmi-keepalive
 pvc 0/101
  encapsulation aal5snap
  protocol ppp dialer
  dialer pool-member 1
 !
!
interface Dialer1
 ip address 10.1.12.1 255.255.255.0
 encapsulation ppp
 dialer pool 1
!
 
R2:
!
interface ATM3/0
 no ip address
 no atm ilmi-keepalive
 pvc 0/101
  encapsulation aal5snap
  protocol ppp Virtual-Template1
 !
!
interface Virtual-Template1
 ip address 10.1.12.2 255.255.255.0
!
 
P.S.
When I configured the same type either Dialer or Virtual-Template on
both sides, then it works.

• Next message: Andrew Lissitz \(alissitz\): "RFC 2547 Link - SP CCIE links"
• Previous message: Thomwin Chen: "Re: Are we required to ping local FR interface ?"
• Maybe in reply to: B Kim: "PPPoA Dialer <---> Virtual-Template"
• Next in thread: Brian Lee: "Re: PPPoA Dialer <---> Virtual-Template"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:00:31 GMT-3