NAT vs SLB

From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Fri Jun 03 2005 - 12:44:43 GMT-3

Next message: CCIE: "Re: BGP Best path- Advertisement"
Previous message: Lee Donald: "RE: BGP Best path- Advertisement"
Next in thread: joshua lauer: "Re: NAT vs SLB"
Maybe reply: joshua lauer: "Re: NAT vs SLB"
Maybe reply: atolstykh@atfam.com: "RE: NAT vs SLB"
Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: NAT vs SLB"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi guys,

Assuming SLB is supported in the lab, what are some clearest clues to use
SLB vs NAT.

Both features can be used to configure Server Load Balancing but not having
studied SLB recently, I'm hoping someone can refresh my memory and share
with me a couple "giveaways" that point to the use one way versus the other.

TIA, Tim

Next message: CCIE: "Re: BGP Best path- Advertisement"
Previous message: Lee Donald: "RE: BGP Best path- Advertisement"
Next in thread: joshua lauer: "Re: NAT vs SLB"
Maybe reply: joshua lauer: "Re: NAT vs SLB"
Maybe reply: atolstykh@atfam.com: "RE: NAT vs SLB"
Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: NAT vs SLB"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:40 GMT-3