RE: NAT vs SLB

From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Fri Jun 03 2005 - 22:26:57 GMT-3


One single IP to have connections shared or balanced with multiple real
devices...

You COULD do destination-based NAT as well, but IMHO both are out of scope
for the R&S exam. IP SLB would actually be simpler to think through (again,
IMHO) and configure.

*shrug*

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
ccie2be
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 11:45 AM
To: Group Study
Subject: NAT vs SLB

Hi guys,
 
Assuming SLB is supported in the lab, what are some clearest clues to use
SLB vs NAT.
 
Both features can be used to configure Server Load Balancing but not having
studied SLB recently, I'm hoping someone can refresh my memory and share
with me a couple "giveaways" that point to the use one way versus the other.
 
TIA, Tim



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:40 GMT-3