From: Sam Joseph (samjoseph747@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Apr 20 2005 - 19:31:04 GMT-3
Scott is right. Here is an Example output from my lab. The router is a 2611
running 12.2T train.
Rack10R2(config)#ipv6 access-list ccie ?
It would be more appropriate to say that, ipv6 uses only named Extended ACL.
From my Lab it appears that way.
Thanks
>From: "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>
>Reply-To: "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>
>To: "'ccie2be'" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>, "'Group Study'"
><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: ipv6 acl's
>Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 18:09:31 -0400
>
>I believe all of them are extended ACLs. Using the "?" will assist in
>figuring that out. But I haven't seen my routers magically adding things
>in
>like that!
>
>Scott
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>ccie2be
>Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 5:41 PM
>To: Group Study
>Subject: ipv6 acl's
>
>Hi guys,
>
>When configuring an ipv6 acl, is there anything like a standard acl in ipv4
>or are all ipv6 "extended"?
>
>I'm trying to understand a route-map being used to select ipv6 addresses to
>be redistributed. The route-map references an ipv6 acl
>
>and the acl was like this:
>
>ipv6 access-list Connected->RIP
> permit ipv6 FEC0::123:0/125 any
> permit ipv6 FEC0::103:0/126 any
>
>
>Notice the "any" at the end of each acl statement. Is added that required?
>Will the IOS add that if you don't?
>
>I don't have a router to test this so any feedback would be greatly
>appreciated.
>
>TIA, Tim
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 03 2005 - 07:55:05 GMT-3