ipv6 acl's

From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Wed Apr 20 2005 - 18:41:23 GMT-3

• Next message: marvin greenlee: "RE: ipv6 acl's [bcc][faked-from]"
• Previous message: Brant I. Stevens: "RE: UPLINKFAST versus BACKBONEFAST"
• Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: ipv6 acl's"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: ipv6 acl's"
• Maybe reply: Sam Joseph: "RE: ipv6 acl's"
• Maybe reply: gladston@br.ibm.com: "Re: ipv6 acl's"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi guys,
 
When configuring an ipv6 acl, is there anything like a standard acl in ipv4
or are all ipv6 "extended"?
 
I'm trying to understand a route-map being used to select ipv6 addresses to
be redistributed. The route-map references an ipv6 acl
 
and the acl was like this:
 
ipv6 access-list Connected->RIP
 permit ipv6 FEC0::123:0/125 any
 permit ipv6 FEC0::103:0/126 any
 
 
Notice the "any" at the end of each acl statement. Is added that required?
Will the IOS add that if you don't?
 
I don't have a router to test this so any feedback would be greatly
appreciated.
 
TIA, Tim

• Next message: marvin greenlee: "RE: ipv6 acl's [bcc][faked-from]"
• Previous message: Brant I. Stevens: "RE: UPLINKFAST versus BACKBONEFAST"
• Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: ipv6 acl's"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: ipv6 acl's"
• Maybe reply: Sam Joseph: "RE: ipv6 acl's"
• Maybe reply: gladston@br.ibm.com: "Re: ipv6 acl's"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 03 2005 - 07:55:04 GMT-3