From: Lanny Ballard (lanny26ga@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Apr 20 2005 - 21:33:42 GMT-3
I am doing yet another route redistribution lab, and i have a question
I was under the assumption that in order to redistribut a route into a
routing protocol, that route had to be in the rout table; however, i have
done a lab recently where I was redistribution ospf into eigrp, and eigrp
advertised a route that was connected, and not an ospf route.
here is the example.
route 5 is mutually redistributing between ospf and eigrp.
Now if you notice I have added 10.5.5.5 to the ospf process. This address
is a loopback interface. But eigrp is also advertising it. Why is this? I
thought eigrp should only advertise this route if it was in the route table
as an ospf route, but it is in the route table as connected.
C 10.5.5.0 is directly connected, Loopback0
router eigrp 100
redistribute ospf 1 metric 1544 100 255 1 1500
network 172.150.1.5 0.0.0.0
no auto-summary
!
router ospf 1
router-id 10.5.5.5
log-adjacency-changes
area 0 authentication message-digest
area 1 nssa default-information-originate
redistribute eigrp 100 metric 10 subnets
network 10.5.5.5 0.0.0.0 area 0
network 172.150.5.5 0.0.0.0 area 0
network 172.150.8.5 0.0.0.0 area 1
neighbor 172.150.5.6
neighbor 172.150.5.2
TIA for any help!
Lanny
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 03 2005 - 07:55:05 GMT-3