From: Pankaj Madhukar Kulkarni (PankajKu@hclcomnet.co.in)
Date: Wed Apr 20 2005 - 16:01:27 GMT-3
Hi Mihia,
I think this should work. EIGRP external routes with admin distance 90
should be preferred over the OSPF external routes (110). Let me try this
option.
Thanks for the prompt reply.
Regards,
Pankaj K
________________________________
From: Mihai Petcu [mailto:mpetcu2004@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 12:15 AM
To: san; Pankaj Madhukar Kulkarni
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: lowering admin for EIGRP external routes
Hi,
You can also try using "distance eigrp 90 90" under "router eigrp".
HTH,
Mihai
san <san.study@gmail.com> wrote:
Try configuring the below command on R2's Eigrp Interface
"ip summary address eigrp x [network address & mask]"
This should reduce the AD to 90.
/SAN
On 4/20/05, Pankaj Madhukar Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi Group,
>
> A have a scenario in which rip routes are redistributed into
EIGRP.
> There are 2 EIGRP routers sharing border with the OSPF domain.
EIGRP and
> OSPF are mutually redistributing routes.
>
> R1---RIP-----R2 ----EIGRP-----R3-----OSPF ------R5
>
> | |
>
> ------EIGRP-----R4-----OSPF-------R6
>
> The RIP routes are installed on R3 and R4 with an admin
distance of 170.
> Upon redistribution the routes are received thru the OSPF
domain as
> external type 5 with an admin distance of 110 making it the
preferred
> path.
>
> I wanted to know the solution to reduce the admin distance of
EIGRP
> redistributed routes on R3 and R4. Something similar to the
"distance
> 100 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255" option under RIP.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Regards,
>
> Pankaj K
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 03 2005 - 07:55:04 GMT-3