From: Joe Smith (j333smith@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Mar 19 2005 - 15:22:11 GMT-3
I would do a debug ip rip
>From: "MANU mohan" <cciemanu@rediffmail.com>
>Reply-To: "MANU mohan" <cciemanu@rediffmail.com>
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: network 0.0.0.0 in RIP
>Date: 19 Mar 2005 15:49:53 -0000
>
>
>Hi all,
> I have already noted down this problem,but didn't get a
>reply.Anyone have any idea with this.
> I have a doubt regarding the network
>statement used in RIP.I configured RIP between two routers.Suppose this is
>the
>topoogy:
>
>1.0.0.0 (lo 0)----R1--s0----12.0.0.0/8---s0--R2-------2.0.0.0(lo 0)
>Here is the configuration
>
>R1
>router rip
>network 1.0.0.0
>network 12.0.0.0
>
>R2
>router rip
>network 0.0.0.0
>
> In this case R2 is receiving routes from R1 but
>R2 will not advertise any routes although RIP has been enabled on serial
>interface.
>So is this similar to "enabling RIP on all interfaces and giving
>passive-interface default" ?
>
>Thanks in advance,
>
>Manu
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 03 2005 - 17:56:48 GMT-3