From: MANU mohan (cciemanu@rediffmail.com)
Date: Sun Mar 20 2005 - 09:42:59 GMT-3
Hi,
I have done the debug also which shows R2 doesn't advertise
anything,but still receives routes from R1.Here is the output.In this case R1
is connected to R2 via Fastethernet ports.
-----------------------------------------------
Debug from R1
R1#debug ip
rip
RIP protocol debugging is on
R1#
00:14:14: RIP: sending v1 update to
255.255.255.255 via FastEthernet0/1 (12.0.0
1)
00:14:14: RIP: build update
entries
00:14:14: network 1.0.0.0 metric 1
00:14:14: RIP: sending v1
update to 255.255.255.255 via Loopback0 (1.0.0.1)
00:14:14: RIP: build update
entries
00:14:14: network 12.0.0.0 metric 1
00:14:41: RIP: sending v1
update to 255.255.255.255 via FastEthernet0/1 (12.0.0
1)
00:14:41: RIP: build
update entries
00:14:41: network 1.0.0.0 metric 1
00:14:41: RIP: sending
v1 update to 255.255.255.255 via Loopback0 (1.0.0.1)
00:14:41: RIP: build
update entries
00:14:41: network 12.0.0.0 metric 1
00:15:10: RIP:
sending v1 update to 255.255.255.255 via FastEthernet0/1 (12.0.0
1)
---------------------------------------
Debug from R2
R2#debug ip rip
RIP
protocol debugging is on
R2#
00:13:58: RIP: received v1 update from 12.0.0.1
on FastEthernet0/1
00:13:58: 1.0.0.0 in 1 hops
00:14:24: RIP: received v1
update from 12.0.0.1 on FastEthernet0/1
00:14:24: 1.0.0.0 in 1 hops
00:14:51: RIP: received v1 update from 12.0.0.1 on FastEthernet0/1
00:14:51:
1.0.0.0 in 1 hops
00:15:20: RIP: received v1 update from 12.0.0.1 on
FastEthernet0/1
00:15:20: 1.0.0.0 in 1 hops
00:15:47: RIP: received v1
update from 12.0.0.1 on FastEthernet0/1
00:15:47: 1.0.0.0 in 1 hops
00:16:13: RIP: received v1 update from 12.0.0.1 on FastEthernet0/1
00:16:13:
1.0.0.0 in 1 hops
00:16:43: RIP: received v1 update from 12.0.0.1 on
FastEthernet0/1
00:16:43: 1.0.0.0 in 1 hops
00:17:11: RIP: received v1
update from 12.0.0.1 on FastEthernet0/1
00:17:11: 1.0.0.0 in 1 hops
00:17:40: RIP: received v1 update from 12.0.0.1 on FastEthernet0/1
00:17:40:
1.0.0.0 in 1 hops
00:18:08: RIP: received v1 update from 12.0.0.1 on
FastEthernet0/1
00:18:08: 1.0.0.0 in 1 hops
00:18:38: RIP: received v1
update from 12.0.0.1 on FastEthernet0/1
00:18:38: 1.0.0.0 in 1 hops
------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks,
Manu
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 Joe Smith wrote :
>I would do a debug ip rip
>
>>
From: "MANU mohan" <cciemanu@rediffmail.com>
>>Reply-To: "MANU mohan"
<cciemanu@rediffmail.com>
>>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>>Subject: network
0.0.0.0 in RIP
>>Date: 19 Mar 2005 15:49:53 -0000
>>
>>
>>Hi all,
>> I have
already noted down this problem,but didn't get a
>>reply.Anyone have any idea
with this.
>> I have a doubt regarding the network
>>statement used in RIP.I
configured RIP between two routers.Suppose this is the
>>topoogy:
>>
>>1.0.0.0
(lo 0)----R1--s0----12.0.0.0/8---s0--R2-------2.0.0.0(lo 0)
>>Here is the
configuration
>>
>>R1
>>router rip
>>network 1.0.0.0
>>network 12.0.0.0
>>
>>R2
>>router rip
>>network 0.0.0.0
>>
>> In this case R2 is receiving
routes from R1 but
>>R2 will not advertise any routes although RIP has been
enabled on serial
>>interface.
>>So is this similar to "enabling RIP on all
interfaces and giving
>>passive-interface default" ?
>>
>>Thanks in advance,
>>
>>Manu
>>
>>_______________________________________________________________________
>>Subscription information may be found at:
>>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>FREE
pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar get it now!
http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 03 2005 - 17:56:48 GMT-3