From: null void (nullv0idmain@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Feb 08 2005 - 02:10:38 GMT-3
On page 449 of Cisco Press CCIE prac studies 2 book , there is an example of car .. specifically example 6-22 , above it lists the specs the the 6-22 config sample is trying to maintain . Is that right ? From previous threads on car , I thought if you have a 4 line rate-limit list on an interface , for the packet to go from line 1 to the next rate-limit commands you had to use the "conform-action continue" or else the packet would be transmited , this example doesnt do that ? Any insight ?
TIA
Null
null void <nullv0idmain@yahoo.com> wrote:
If you are using car to say match on some previously marked packet , is there a difference between matching IP Prec say via an "access-list rate-limit" command or a standard ACL ? In most explanations of CAR whenever they refer to matching ip prec , they always use the " access-limit rate-limit" method for examples ?? So say you need to match any traffic destined to server 1.1.1.1 for ftp traffic that has IP Prec set to priority would either an extended ACL matching on that precendnce work or an "access-list rate-limit" There is good explanation on page 450 of CCIE prac stud 2 book.....
TIA
Null
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 03 2005 - 08:51:18 GMT-3