BGP Router-ID

From: Jonathan ZD (Nuvo25@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Feb 01 2005 - 17:03:22 GMT-3

Next message: ccie2be: "Re: Frame Relay - answer on compression"
Previous message: ccie2be: "Re: Frame Relay"
Next in thread: Bob Sinclair: "Re: BGP Router-ID"
Maybe reply: Bob Sinclair: "Re: BGP Router-ID"
Maybe reply: Bajo: "Re: BGP Router-ID"
Maybe reply: James Matrisciano: "RE: BGP Router-ID"
Maybe reply: Brian McGahan: "RE: BGP Router-ID"
Maybe reply: Bajo: "Re: BGP Router-ID"
Maybe reply: niko: "Re: BGP Router-ID"
Maybe reply: Howard C. Berkowitz: "Re: BGP Router-ID"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Is it neccessary that BGP Router-ID has to be reachable by its BGP-peers. For
example, if the following configuration valid?

Rtr 01

router bgp 100
bgp router-id 1.1.1.1
nei 192.168.21.2 remot 100

---------

Rtr 02

router bgp 100
bgp router-id 2.2.2.2
nei 192.168.21.1 remot 100

*** The router-id (1.1.1.1 and 2.2.2.2), in this case, is not reachable by IGP
between both routers.

----------

Thanks

Next message: ccie2be: "Re: Frame Relay - answer on compression"
Previous message: ccie2be: "Re: Frame Relay"
Next in thread: Bob Sinclair: "Re: BGP Router-ID"
Maybe reply: Bob Sinclair: "Re: BGP Router-ID"
Maybe reply: Bajo: "Re: BGP Router-ID"
Maybe reply: James Matrisciano: "RE: BGP Router-ID"
Maybe reply: Brian McGahan: "RE: BGP Router-ID"
Maybe reply: Bajo: "Re: BGP Router-ID"
Maybe reply: niko: "Re: BGP Router-ID"
Maybe reply: Howard C. Berkowitz: "Re: BGP Router-ID"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 03 2005 - 08:51:15 GMT-3