From: Bajo (bajoalex@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Feb 01 2005 - 17:48:31 GMT-3
Jonathan it will be valid only if
a) either the address is a loopback interface or
b) a physical interface address.
The interface does NOT need to be running BGP.
Take a look at Jeff Doyle's Routing TCP/IP Vll, page 154.
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 12:03:22 -0800, Jonathan ZD <Nuvo25@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Is it neccessary that BGP Router-ID has to be reachable by its BGP-peers. For
> example, if the following configuration valid?
>
> Rtr 01
>
> router bgp 100
> bgp router-id 1.1.1.1
> nei 192.168.21.2 remot 100
>
> ---------
>
> Rtr 02
>
> router bgp 100
> bgp router-id 2.2.2.2
> nei 192.168.21.1 remot 100
>
> *** The router-id (1.1.1.1 and 2.2.2.2), in this case, is not reachable by IGP
> between both routers.
>
> ----------
>
> Thanks
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Regards,Bajo
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 03 2005 - 08:51:15 GMT-3