Re: 3550 or 3750

From: James (james@towardex.com)
Date: Sat Jan 29 2005 - 20:09:16 GMT-3

Next message: Scott Morris: "RE: FRTS"
Previous message: gladston@br.ibm.com: "FRTS"
Maybe in reply to: jellyboy: "3550 or 3750"
Next in thread: Walker, James - Is: "RE: 3550 or 3750"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 05:23:50PM -0500, Balaji Siva wrote:
> 3750 is different in architecture than 3550 and qos features differ.
> So I think you should only use 3550 if you preping for the lab.
> Ofcourse some of the features are the same so depends on what you are
> doing ..

3750 is basically 3550 with increased TCAM structures and a few other things.

-J

-- 
James Jun                                            TowardEX Technologies, Inc.
Technical Lead                      Boston IPv4/IPv6 Web Hosting, Colocation and
james@towardex.com            Network design/consulting & configuration services
cell: 1(978)-394-2867           web: http://www.towardex.com , noc: www.twdx.net

Next message: Scott Morris: "RE: FRTS"
Previous message: gladston@br.ibm.com: "FRTS"
Maybe in reply to: jellyboy: "3550 or 3750"
Next in thread: Walker, James - Is: "RE: 3550 or 3750"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 02 2005 - 22:10:27 GMT-3