Re: Port Channeling !!!!

From: MADMAN (david.madland@qwest.com)
Date: Mon Nov 29 2004 - 17:29:44 GMT-3


   I have done this and it worked fine, don't recall the IOS though. I
assume your channel interface is up, can you send the configs?

   Dave

Richard Anderson wrote:

> Has someone come a cross a problem with Port-Channeling between 6509 and
> 6513. Both are running sup720 and IOS 12.2(17a)sx4?
>
> I have a (2) Single Mode Fiber running between these switches, and have
> configured a Layer III port channel. The channels are up, but I can't ping a
> cross. I can't even ping the directly connected interface. It's more likely
> an intermittent issue as I was able to ping last week. Nothing has been
> changed and yet the ping traffic failed this morning.
>
> I didn't see any caveat about port-channeling on CCO for the IOS release
> 12.2(17a)sx4.
>
> Note: I am running OSPF routing protocol.
>
>
> Here is the debug from "DEBUG IP PACKET 100 DETAIL"
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
>
>
> D000RTR01#debug ip packet 100 detail
> IP packet debugging is on (detailed) for access list 100
> D000RTR01#ping 10.180.1.26
>
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.180.1.26, timeout is 2 seconds:
>
> Nov 29 11:51:18.283 PST: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGDP: list 100 permitted icmp
> 10.180.1.
> 25 -> 10.180.1.26 (0/0), 1 packet
> Nov 29 11:51:18.283 PST: IP: s=10.180.1.25 (local), d=10.180.1.26
> (Port-channel4
> 3), len 100, sending
> Nov 29 11:51:18.283 PST: ICMP type=8, code=0
> Nov 29 11:51:18.283 PST: IP: s=10.180.1.25 (local), d=10.180.1.26
> (Port-channel4
> 3), len 100, encapsulation failed
> Nov 29 11:51:18.283 PST: ICMP type=8, code=0.
> Nov 29 11:51:20.279 PST: IP: s=10.180.1.25 (local), d=10.180.1.26
> (Port-channel4
> 3), len 100, sending
> Nov 29 11:51:20.279 PST: ICMP type=8, code=0
> Nov 29 11:51:20.279 PST: IP: s=10.180.1.25 (local), d=10.180.1.26
> (Port-channel4
> 3), len 100, encapsulation failed
> Nov 29 11:51:20.279 PST: ICMP type=8, code=0.
> Nov 29 11:51:22.279 PST: IP: s=10.180.1.25 (local), d=10.180.1.26
> (Port-channel4
> 3), len 100, sending
> Nov 29 11:51:22.279 PST: ICMP type=8, code=0
> Nov 29 11:51:22.279 PST: IP: s=10.180.1.25 (local), d=10.180.1.26
> (Port-channel4
> 3), len 100, encapsulation failed
> Nov 29 11:51:22.279 PST: ICMP type=8, code=0.
> Nov 29 11:51:24.279 PST: IP: s=10.180.1.25 (local), d=10.180.1.26
> (Port-channel4
> 3), len 100, sending
> Nov 29 11:51:24.279 PST: ICMP type=8, code=0
> Nov 29 11:51:24.279 PST: IP: s=10.180.1.25 (local), d=10.180.1.26
> (Port-channel4
> 3), len 100, encapsulation failed
> Nov 29 11:51:24.279 PST: ICMP type=8, code=0.
> Nov 29 11:51:26.279 PST: IP: s=10.180.1.25 (local), d=10.180.1.26
> (Port-channel4
> 3), len 100, sending
> Nov 29 11:51:26.279 PST: ICMP type=8, code=0
> Nov 29 11:51:26.279 PST: IP: s=10.180.1.25 (local), d=10.180.1.26
> (Port-channel4
> 3), len 100, encapsulation failed
> Nov 29 11:51:26.279 PST: ICMP type=8, code=0.
> Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
> D000RTR01#
>
> [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of spacer.gif]
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>

-- 
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Sr. Network Engineer
Qwest Communications
612-664-3367

"Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 02 2004 - 06:57:51 GMT-3