From: Georg Pauwen (pauwen@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Nov 13 2004 - 19:44:41 GMT-3
Hello,
either one will work, it depends on what the requirement is. I think Cisco
prefers not to redistribute BGP into the IGP, so the next-hop-self on R2
probably is the better option.
Regards,
Georg
>From: inlink <inlink@klsc.co.kr>
>Reply-To: inlink <inlink@klsc.co.kr>
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: stupid question BGP Next-hop-self
>Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 15:15:57 +0900
>
> Hi, all
>IF R3 know ebgp(bb1) next-hop-self via igp(rip),
>does r2 need to next-hop-self for r3?
>
>197.68.22.0---BB1--------R2----------R3
>EBGP IBGP
>1.
>R3# sh ip bgp
>*> i197.68.22.0 150.100.1.254(BB1) 0 100 0 254 253 i
>
>R3#sh ip ro rip 150.100.1.0
>R 150.100.1.0 [120/1] via R2, 00:00:26, Serial0/0(R2)
>
>2. r2 next-hop-self
>R3# sh ip bgp
>*> i197.68.22.0 2.2.2.2(R2) 0 100 0 254 253 i
>
>Which answer is more exactly ?
>
>[IMAGE]
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 02 2004 - 06:57:43 GMT-3