Re: stupid question BGP Next-hop-self

From: Joe Chang (changjoe@earthlink.net)
Date: Sat Nov 13 2004 - 21:08:16 GMT-3


I can see why it would not be a good idea to redistribute BGP into the IGP if the network were a stub. However if the network is a transit network BGP must be redistributed into the IGP unless "no-synchronization" is allowed on the border routers.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Georg Pauwen" <pauwen@hotmail.com>
To: <inlink@klsc.co.kr>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 5:44 PM
Subject: RE: stupid question BGP Next-hop-self

> Hello,
>
> either one will work, it depends on what the requirement is. I think Cisco
> prefers not to redistribute BGP into the IGP, so the next-hop-self on R2
> probably is the better option.
>
> Regards,
>
> Georg



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 02 2004 - 06:57:43 GMT-3