From: Tiean (noktes@bellsouth.net)
Date: Thu Nov 04 2004 - 03:15:38 GMT-3
As I understand, igmp has already set ttl in ip header to 1, it won't cross
the local. So,the acl in ip igmp command just control host on those local
interface to join the multicast group address. While multicast boundary ,
restrict certain multicast group to transit in both direction of the
interface. Both command are under the interface. Someone correct me if I am
wrong.
Montiean
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Matus" <jmatus@pacbell.net>
To: "lab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 11:21 PM
Subject: igmp access-l vs. multicast boundary
> what is the functional difference between:
> ip igmp access-group 1
> and
> ip multicast-boundary 1.....
>
> both seem to stop a a range of multicast addresses from traversing a
> router...
> is it that 'igmp access-g' stops clients from joining and
'multicast-boundary'
> stops the address from transiting the router?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> John D. Matus
> MCSE, CCNP
> Office: 818-782-2061
> Cell: 818-430-8372
> jmatus@pacbell.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 02 2004 - 06:57:38 GMT-3